Madanasinghage Upali Ananda v. Range Forest Officer and Hon. Attorney General – CA PHC 69/2014-2017

In the case between Madanasinghage Upali Ananda (appellant) and the Range Forest Officer, Embilipitiya, and the Hon. Attorney General (respondents), the court addressed the issue of whether the confiscation of a vehicle used to transport timber without a permit was justified, and whether the registered owner had adequately discharged the legal burden to prevent forfeiture. The confiscation was challenged on the grounds that the owner had instructed his son (the driver) not to act unlawfully. It was held that mere instructions to avoid illegality were insufficient, and active, reasonable precautions were required to avoid liability. The court reaffirmed the principle that ownership entails a duty of due diligence, particularly where the owner is aware of potential for misuse. The judgment r

REF: CA PHC 69/2014-2017 Category: Tag:
Scroll to Top