Malamie Janthi Mahakumara v. Gonagala Withanage Roshana Ajith – CA NO.825/97 F -2017

In the case between Malamie Janthi Mahakumara and others (Substituted-Defendant-Appellants) and Gonagala Withanage Roshana Ajith and others (Plaintiff-Respondents), the court addressed the issue of entitlement to possession and title to property following the expiration of a life interest. It was held that the plaintiff-respondents possessed valid title to the property, as the defense failed to establish any legal right of possession after the life interest terminated. The principle reaffirmed was that acceptance of a gift by minors is legally effective when the gift is beneficial, and objections to documentary evidence must be raised promptly or are deemed waived. Reliance was placed on established legal authorities and Sections 116 and relevant provisions of the Evidence Ordinance, empha

REF: CA NO.825/97 F -2017 Category: Tag:
Scroll to Top