Warnadhipathiya Kurukulasuriya Paththini Hennadige Indrajith Rodrigo v. Eulin Hemalatha Perera and Koralage Jayasena – CA PHC/181/2011-2017

In the case between Warnadhipathiya Kurukulasuriya Paththini Hennadige Indrajith Rodrigo and Eulin Hemalatha Perera with Koralage Jayasena, the court addressed the issue of whether the Magistrate’s Court order refusing the appellant’s application under section 66(1)(b) should have been revised by the Provincial High Court, and whether the appellant’s appeal against that refusal was meritorious. It was held that no grounds existed to disturb the findings of the Magistrate’s Court or the Provincial High Court, reaffirming the principle that appellate review will not be granted in the absence of material error or injustice. The decision relied on the sequence of adjudication from the Magistrate’s Court and High Court, noting procedural regularity and the appellant’s lack of engagement, emphas