State vs. Defendant: Affirmation of Conviction and Sentence – 92/2013-2020

In the case between the Hon. Attorney General, Attorney General’s Department, Colombo 12 (Complainant/Respondent) and Athucorala Arachchige Karunarathna (Accused/Appellant), the court addressed whether the conviction for rape of a minor under Section 364(2)(e) of the Penal Code was justified based on the evidence and procedural conduct of the trial. The conviction and sentence imposed by the High Court of Tangalle were challenged on grounds of credibility, procedural regularity, and alleged miscarriage of justice. The findings established that no procedural or substantive irregularity prejudiced the accused’s right to a fair trial, that the evidence and medical testimony supported the complainant’s version, and that the legal requirements regarding delays in reporting and corroboration had

REF: 92/2013-2020 Category: Tag:
Scroll to Top