Atapaththu Ralalage Sudarshanie and others Vs. Mahamalage Imesh Jood Madushanka Perera – CA PHC/APN 0103/2021-2021

In the case between Atapaththu Ralalage Sudarshanie (Petitioner-Petitioner) and the Chief Inspector of Police, Police Station, Panadura (Complainant-Respondent), the court addressed the issue of whether Mahamalage Imesh Jood Madusanka Perera was entitled to bail under the Poisons, Opium and Dangerous Drugs Ordinance (as amended by Act No. 13 of 1984), following the refusal of bail by the High Court. The court held that prolonged remand without indictment and significant deficiencies in the B Report constituted “exceptional circumstances” under the Act, justifying the grant of bail. This decision reaffirmed the principle that both procedural compliance and the substantive right to liberty under statutory bail limitations must be upheld. Reliance was placed on relevant statutory provisions a

REF: CA PHC/APN 0103/2021-2021 Category: Tag:
Scroll to Top