Mohamed Samsudeen Kadeeja Hanim vs. Abdul Latheef Mohamed Sahabdeen and Others – CA RII NO. 12/2022-2022

In the case between Mohamed Pasi Mohomed Faizer (deceased) and 25 others (Plaintiff Respondents) and Abdul Latheef Mohamed Sahabdeen (deceased) and others (Defendant Petitioners), the court addressed issues relating to the propriety of revision and restitutio in integrum under Article 138 of the Constitution, focusing on procedural deficiencies in summons service and the accurate identification of the subject matter, particularly regarding the survey plan and share allocation of land. The findings established that procedural irregularities, notably the lack of proper summon service to the 27th defendant and issues in judicial handling of contested points, warranted judicial intervention. These determinations underscored the premature nature of deciding evidentiary or legal disputes at this