Sinnathambi Balasubramaniam & Ramasami Palanimuththu alias Palani vs. The Honorable Attorney General – CA HCC/0041-042-16-2022

In the case between Sinnathambi Balasubramaniam, Ramasami Palanimuththu alias Palani (Appellants), and the Honorable Attorney General (Respondent), the court examined whether the sole eyewitness testimony (PW1) was credible and sufficient to uphold a conviction for murder. It was determined that the uncorroborated but credible testimony of PW1, alongside supporting police and medical evidence, sufficed to sustain the conviction. The decision confirmed that credible sole eyewitness testimony, when supported by ancillary evidence, can legally justify a conviction for murder. Reliance was placed on the Evidence Ordinance and the Penal Code, with the ruling emphasizing cautious but legitimate judicial reliance on such testimony where supported by the record and proper judicial assessment.

R.