Palitha Hemaratne Kankanamge et al. vs Urban Development Authority et al. – WRT – 0250/22-2023

In the case between Palitha Hemaratne Kankanamge, Lane Anton Rosario Johnson, and others (Petitioners) and the Urban Development Authority (UDA) with associated officials (Respondents), the court addressed the legality of quit notices issued under the State Lands (Recovery of Possession) Act and the extent of the Minister’s authority to direct the competent authority regarding ejectment of tenants. It was held that the quit notices were validly issued in accordance with the law, the rights of the petitioners as monthly tenants had been circumscribed by explicit lease terms permitting termination upon one month’s notice, and there was no breach of natural justice or unlawful ministerial interference. The authority and actions of the UDA and Minister were found to be within the statutory fra