Sarath Fonseka vs Mahinda Rajapakse et al. – SC PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION PETITION NO. 01/2010-2010

In the case between Sarath Fonseka (petitioner) and Mahinda Rajapakse with other respondents, the court addressed issues arising from the 2010 Presidential Election, specifically allegations of corrupt and illegal practices, including intimidation, bribery, and procedural violations under the Presidential Elections Act 1981. It was determined that the petition did not conform to the mandatory statutory requirements concerning the nature of relief sought, joinder of necessary parties, and adequacy of pleadings and affidavits. The findings established that a strict and literal interpretation of Sections 91, 94, 95, and 96 of the Act was required, and the failures in compliance rendered the petition defective. On this basis, the election petition was dismissed in limine. The decision reaffirm