W.H.M. Gunaratne and others vs Land Reform Commission and others – SC Appeal 162/2013-2025

In the matter between the appellants and the Land Reform Commission, the court addressed the issue of quashing quit notices issued to landowners. The court held that the appeal should be dismissed, reaffirming the principle that disputed facts unsuited for writ jurisdiction cannot be adjudicated in such proceedings. This decision relied on precedents establishing that writ applications will not be allowed where major facts require a full inquiry and on the provisions of the State Lands (Recovery of Possession) Act regarding the onus of proof on occupiers. The key takeaway is that alternative remedies are available for those claiming ownership of land from which they face eviction.

Sampath B. Abayakoon, J. – Dismissed the appeal, affirming the Court of Appeal’s decision. It was determine