Rasheed Ali v. Mohamed Ali and Others – sllr 1981 volume 1 page 262

In the case between Khan Mohamed Ali (plaintiff/respondent and execution creditor) and Mohamed Haniffa Rasheed Ali (appellant, alleged possessor of the disputed premises), the court addressed whether an order under section 326 of the Civil Procedure Code is final or interlocutory, and examined the propriety of the Court of Appeal’s exercise of revisionary powers, as well as compliance with Rule 46 of the Supreme Court Rules 1978 concerning procedural documentation. It was held that the revisionary powers of the Court of Appeal should be exercised only in exceptional circumstances and that non-compliance with procedural requirements, coupled with inconsistent evidence regarding tenancy and possession, justified dismissing the appeal. The principle reaffirmed is that collateral and inconsist