Fernando v. Hemachandra – sllr 1989 volume 1 page 379

In the case between Fernando (plaintiff) and Hemachandra (defendant), the court addressed the issue of whether the execution of a writ should be stayed pending appeal, with particular consideration to the proper substitution of the decree-holder in compliance with Section 339 of the Civil Procedure Code and the jurisdiction of the court based on the valuation of the subject matter. It was held that there was no basis for the continuation of the stay order on the execution, reiterating the principle that objections not raised at the appropriate procedural stage cannot typically be entertained on appeal. The findings relied on statutory provisions governing substitution, execution, and jurisdiction, underscoring that procedural compliance and timely objections are fundamental to the administ