Parakrama v. Bank of Ceylon – sllr 1995 volume 1 page 115

In the case between Parakrama (Appellant) and the Bank of Ceylon (Respondent), the court addressed the lawfulness of the appellant’s termination during his probation period based on his failure to satisfy confirmation requirements, including passing requisite examinations, submitting a medical report, and demonstrating satisfactory conduct. It was held that the termination was justified, and the compensation awarded by the Court of Appeal was appropriate. The decision reaffirmed the principle that probationary employment is subject to certain confirmation criteria and that failure to fulfil these requirements may justify termination. Reliance was placed on the factual matrix, applicable employment law standards, and precedents governing probationary dismissal. The outcome underscores that