Ameen and Others vs Mohideen and Others – sllr 2006 volume 2 page 107

In the case between Ameen and Others (plaintiffs) and Mohideen and Others (defendants), the court addressed the permissibility of a revision application against a final order of the Wakfs Tribunal and a related order of the Wakfs Board. It was determined that the impugned order was final and directly appealable, rendering the revision application improper. The application failed to establish exceptional circumstances justifying the invocation of the court’s revisionary jurisdiction, and it was also found that the remedy of restitutio in integrum was unavailable due to the improper addition of parties who were not part of the original proceedings. This outcome reaffirmed the principle that revisionary jurisdiction is reserved for exceptional situations and only for those with standing as pa