Piyasena De Silva And Others v. Ven. Wimalawansa Thero And Another – sllr 2006 volume 1 page 219

In the case between Piyasena de Silva and Others (Appellants) and Ven. Wimalawansa Thero and Another (Respondents), the court addressed the legality of refusing an application for intervention in a writ of mandamus by issuing an order in chambers, without a hearing or stated reasons. It was held that such refusal contravened Article 106(1) of the Constitution, which guarantees public sittings, and breached the principles of natural justice, including the right to be heard. The decision underscored the obligation for judicial transparency and the necessity of providing reasons for decisions affecting fundamental rights. Relying on constitutional mandates and established precedents, the court affirmed that orders involving substantial rights must adhere to due process, with the appeal allowe