Rosalin Hami vs. Hewage Hami and 8 Others – sllr 2011 volume 2 page 413

In the case between the Respondent, who sought declaration of title and possession over a disputed parcel of land, and the Appellant, who claimed adverse and undisturbed possession, the main issues addressed were the validity of delivery of possession executed by the Fiscal under a writ, and whether the Appellant established exclusive and uninterrupted possession sufficient for a prescription claim. The findings established that the delivery of possession was effectively executed, as supported by the writ and supporting documents, and that the Appellant failed to provide evidence of continuous, undisturbed possession required to sustain a prescription or adverse possession claim. The court, upon review of documentary evidence and relevant legal principles, upheld the validity of the Respon