AI Pazz

Who owns the copyrights for music under Sri Lanka law

Who owns a song? Who owns the copyrights for music under Sri Lanka law? Supreme Court clarifies copyright and performer rights.

In Sri Lanka, disputes between musicians and artists over song ownership are more common than you think- raising the big question: who really owns the copyrights for music? In this case, the Supreme Court steps in with a clear and decisive answer. Title: Torana Music Distributors Pvt. Ltd. vs Lucian BulathsinhalaCase Number: SC CHC APPEAL […]

Who owns a song? Who owns the copyrights for music under Sri Lanka law? Supreme Court clarifies copyright and performer rights. Read More »

Keheliya Rambukwella medicine procurement case

Keheliya Rambukwella medicine case | Download PDF

Case Title: Transparency International Sri Lanka vs Hon. Ranil Wickramasinghe and others.(Keheliya Rambukwella Medicine Procurement Case)Court: Supreme Court of Sri Lanka | SC FR 65/2023 with SC FR 82/2023Before : P. PADMAN SURASENA, CJ. KUMUDINI WICKREMASINGHE, J. JANAK DE SILVA, J.Decided on: 27th March 2026 In the matter of Transparency International Sri Lanka and Ashala Nadishani Perera

Keheliya Rambukwella medicine case | Download PDF Read More »

Can state institutions hide public spending

Can state institutions hide public spending? Landmark Sri Lankan RTI cases explained

Can the navy hide public spending? Court says RTI cannot be blocked by vague ‘National Security’ claims.Landmark Sri Lankan RTI Cases explained. Title: Vice Admiral Priyantha Perera, Commander, Sri Lanka Navy v. A.A.M.R. Ali and Others Case number: CA CA RTI 08/2023Decided on: 2026-03-19Before: Justice R. Gurusinghe, Justice Dr. Sumudu Premachandra Introduction In a landmark

Can state institutions hide public spending? Landmark Sri Lankan RTI cases explained Read More »

RTI-Case-Law

Right to information case law – Asia Broadcasting Corporation v. M.J.K. Dissanayake

Asia Broadcasting Corporation v. M.J.K. Dissanayake: A Landmark Right to Information case law on Media Accountability in Sri Lanka The decision in Asia Broadcasting Corporation (Pvt) Ltd v. M.J.K. Dissanayake and Others (Court of Appeal, 2026) marks an important development in Sri Lanka’s Right to Information (RTI) jurisprudence. The case addresses a critical question: Can

Right to information case law – Asia Broadcasting Corporation v. M.J.K. Dissanayake Read More »

Sathasivam Murder Case Explained

Sathasivam Murder Case Explained: The Queen v. M. Sathasivam – A Landmark Sri Lankan Criminal Law Case

The Queen v. M. Sathasivam [1953] 55 NLR 255 Introduction The Sathasivam Murder Case, formally reported as The Queen v. M. Sathasivam [1953] 55 NLR 255, stands as one of the most significant and controversial criminal cases in Sri Lankan legal history. The Queen v. M. Sathasivam remains one of the most discussed criminal cases

Sathasivam Murder Case Explained: The Queen v. M. Sathasivam – A Landmark Sri Lankan Criminal Law Case Read More »

Foundations of Rei Vindicatio and Prescription

Reaffirming the Foundations of Rei Vindicatio and Prescription

A Critical Analysis of Nawalage Manel Mahendra Dias & Another v. Premalatha & Others The Supreme Court’s judgment in Nawalage Manel Mahendra Dias & Another v. Premalatha & Others(SC Appeal No. 77/2019), delivered on 5 December 2025, stands out as a meticulously reasoned reaffirmation of several foundational principles of property law- particularly rei vindicatio, prescriptive title, and the

Reaffirming the Foundations of Rei Vindicatio and Prescription Read More »

Determining consent in rape cases

Determining consent in rape cases: Supreme Court Rejects ‘Rape Myths’ 

Title: Punchihewage Sampath Kumara alias Bindu v Hon. Attorney GeneralCase number: S.C.APPEAL 16/2021Decided on: 05/12/2025Before: A.H.M.D. NAWAZ, J. ACHALA WENGAPPULI, J. ARJUNA OBEYESEKERE, J. Consent in rape cases – Either she consented or she did not, no middle ground In a landmark 2025 judgment, the Supreme Court firmly rejected the use of stereotypes and so-called

Determining consent in rape cases: Supreme Court Rejects ‘Rape Myths’  Read More »

Servitude and Prescription - Natural waterflow

Servitude and Prescription | Insights from the Sri Lankan Supreme Court Judgment – Peiris v. Perera

Servitude and Prescription – The Supreme Court decision in W. Arthur Deepal Peiris and Others v. Ranil Perera (SC Appeal 37/2014) has reinforced critical principles of property law, particularly concerning servitudes and prescription, natural water flow rights. The case, which arose from a dispute over rainwater drainage, delves into foundational legal doctrines, including ius fluminis, servitudes by prescription,

Servitude and Prescription | Insights from the Sri Lankan Supreme Court Judgment – Peiris v. Perera Read More »

Scroll to Top